"Those enemies of mine who did not want me to be King over them...."

"THOSE ENEMIES OF MINE WHO DID NOT WANT ME TO BE KING OVER THEM, BRING THEM HERE AND KILL THEM IN FRONT OF ME"

JESUS (LUKE 19:27)

Is this the "Prince of Peace" speaking? According to St. Luke it was.

Even in fable, Jesus, God, seems to have a multiple personality disorder. You can trust me on this one folks, godless bob knows about such things!

IS THIS THE REVERENCE FOR THE SANCTITY OF LIFE .....

.....THAT'S A PART OF THIS JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ETHIC AMERICA IS SUPPOSEDLY BASED ON? GOD HELP US IF IT IS!

WHAT EXACTLY IS IT CHRISTIANS MEAN WHEN THEY SAY THEY HAVE A REVERENCE FOR THE SANCTITY OF LIFE?

THEOCRATIC SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, ANTONIN SCALIA, SAYS HE SUPPORTS THE DEATH PENALTY FOR CHILDREN AND MENTALLY RETARDED PERSONS.

THIS SCALIA STILL HAS ONE BLOODY FOOT PLANTED FIRMLY IN THE INQUISITION-DON'T YOU THINK?

IS THIS A REVERENCE FOR THE SANCTITY OF LIFE?

JESUS SAYS IN LUKE TO BRING TO ME ALL THOSE WHO DON'T WANT ME TO RULE OVER THEM AND KILL THEM IN FRONT OF ME.

IS THIS A REVERENCE FOR THE SANCTITY OF LIFE?

THE MORAL MAJORITY SAYS THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE EXECUTING HOMOSEXUALS.

IS THIS A REVERENCE FOR THE SANCTITY OF LIFE?

PHYSICIAN GEORGE TILLER MURDERED BY CHRISTIAN "RIGHT TO LIFE" FANATIC WHILE ATTENDING, OF ALL PLACES THE HOUSE OF GOD, HIS CHURCH.

EVER HEARD OF THE WITCHES HAMMER?

THERE'S NO REVERENCE FOR THE SANCTITY OF LIFE IN THAT PUBLICATION!

HOW ABOUT THE SECRET AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VATICAN AND ADOLPH HITLER FOR THE POPE TO REMAIN SILENT ON THE MASS MURDER OF JEWS WHO REFUSED TO CONVERT TO CATHOLICISM?

WHAT I WANT TO KNOW IS A REVERENCE FOR THE SANCTITY OF WHOSE LIFE?

I DON'T GET IT. DO YOU? DOES ANYBODY?

TYRANNY OF THE MAJORITY

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN THAT TIMELESS BEACON OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY - THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HAS COWERED AT THE FEET OF THE WEALTHY MORMON CHURCH AND FASCIST EVANGELICALS, BY TAKING AWAY THE RIGHT OF SAME-SEX COUPLES TO FORM LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIPS - COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS MARRIAGE. THE COURT APPARENTLY FEARS A RETURN TO THE DRIVE FOR AN AMERICAN CHRISTIAN THEOCRACY AND PERHAPS FOR GOOD REASON. DURING THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION EVANGELICALS WERE THREATENING INCARCERATION FOR JUDGES WHO RULE CONTRARY TO THEIR BIGOTED AND SUPERNATURAL BELIEFS. IN A FULL FLEDGED THEOCRACY THESE JUDGES WOULD FACE EXECUTION.

BUT THE TIME WILL COME WHEN COMMUNITIES WANT TO, JUSTIFIABLY, BAN A VIOLENT, IMMORAL AND BLOOD SOAKED CHRISTIANITY AND I CAN HEAR THEIR LAMENTS NOW - THIS IS TYRANNY OF THE MAJORITY. IF THE MAJORITY HAS THE RIGHT TO DECIDE WHO HAS WHAT RIGHTS TODAY - BASED ON THEIR PERSONAL PREJUDICES - THEN IT'S THE COMING NEW MAJORITY OF NON-CHRISTIANS WHO WILL OUTLAW THESE HATE GROUPS LEAVING THEM AND THEIR IMAGINARY GOD ON THE TRASH HEAP OF HISTORY - WHERE THEY BELONG.


WHAT GOOD ARE THE CONSTITUTION, BILL OF RIGHTS AND THE GUARANTEE OF A SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, WHEN AMERICAN COURTS FEAR HATE GROUPS AND RELIGIOUS IDEOLOGUES? THIS IS NOT WHAT OUR BRAVE FOUNDING FATHERS INTENDED. WHERE ARE THE BRAVE JUDGES?

THE DEMISE OF EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANITY?

I'M NOT CERTAIN WE'RE AT THE THRESHOLD YET, BUT EVEN EVANGELICALS THEMSELVES SEE THE HANDWRITING ON THE WALL. CERTAINLY MICHAEL SPENCER, WRITING HIS OPINION FOR THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR DOES. WHAT SURPRISES ME IS THAT THE EVANGELICALS ARE SURPRISED!

MR. SPENCER SAYS, BECAUSE OF EVANGELICALS LINKING THEMSELVES SO CLOSELY WITH THE CULTURE WAR AND POLITICAL CONSERVATISM, MODERN SOCIETY IS BECOMING MORE HOSTILE TO THEIR ATTEMPTS AT BLOCKING CULTURAL PROGRESS AND INSTEAD VIEWS THEM AS AN ENEMY OF THE COMMON GOOD.

I THINK POLLS HAVE INDICATED THAT IT'S EVANGELICALS WHO HAVE BEEN BEHIND A KIND OF 'CLOSETED' SUPPORT FOR GEORGE BUSH'S POLICY OF TORTURING POW'S. I KNOW - THEY SAY IT'S OK AS LONG AS WE DON'T CALL POW'S - POW'S. IT'S EVANGELICALS WHO HAVE DEMONIZED LARGE SEGMENTS OF SOCIETY, PREACHING THAT SOME OF US ARE SOMEHOW LESS THAN HUMAN, AND QUITE BRAZENLY CALLING ON THE GOVERNMENT AND LEGISLATORS TO EXECUTE THOSE, WHO FOR A VARIETY OF REASONS, DO NOT SUBSCRIBE TO THEIR SUPERNATURAL AND MYSTICAL BELIEFS - AND YOU'RE SURPRISED AT THE RAPIDLY GROWING HOSTILITY TO RELIGION? DON'T BE!

INDIVIDUALS IN SOCIETY HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO BE HOSTILE TO EVANGELICALS. IT'S A COMPLETELY JUSTIFIABLE AND HUMAN RESPONSE. RELIGION SHOULD BE CRIMINALIZED IN MY OPINION. WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ME THREATENING TO KILL MY NEIGHBOR AND A SPOKESMAN FOR THE MORAL MAJORITY CALLING ON THE GOVERNMENT TO PUT TO DEATH HOMOSEXUALS, OR ANYBODY ELSE THEY DISAPPROVE OF FOR THAT MATTER? RELIGION, AND IT'S PRESENT DAY OFFSPRING LIKE THE MORAL MAJORITY AND REVEREND JAMES DOBSON'S HATE GROUPS, SHOULD BE OUTLAWED AND PARTICIPATION IN THEM PUNISHABLE, AT LEAST, BY INCARCERATION. ON THE OTHER HAND I THINK THAT IN A FREE SOCIETY PEOPLE SHOULD BE ABLE TO WORSHIP A ROCK IF THEY WANT TO - BUT PRIVATELY - AND ONLY WITH A RENEWED EFFORT BY POLICY MAKERS TO GUARANTEE WE HAVE WHAT OUR FOREFATHERS INTENDED - A CLEAR AND CERTAIN SEPARATION BETWEEN CHURCH AND STATE.

READ MICHAEL SPENCER'S OPINION IN THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR -
http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0310/p09s01-coop.html

A CALL TO ARMS!

THE TIME HAS LONG SINCE PAST WHEN IT IS NECESSARY TO BESTOW UNDESERVED RESPECT AND HONOR ON A MAN SIMPLY BECAUSE HE CALLS HIMSELF REVEREND OR PREACHER, WHILE DISPLAYING TOTAL IGNORANCE ABOUT THE NATURE OF HUMAN EXISTENCE, PROFESSES SEETHING HATRED FOR HIS FELLOW MAN AND URGES THE MURDER OF THOSE WHOM HE DISAPPROVES.

DRIVE THIS CHURCH OF LIES TO IT'S KNEES.
- DA VINCI CODE

http://jesuspuzzle.humanists.net/

BREAKING THE RESTRAINTS FROM EIGHT YEARS OF LAYING THE GROUNDWORK.............

FOR A BLOODY CHRISTIAN THEOCRACY!

Breaking News: Iowa Supreme Court rules gay couples can wed

All justices concur in landmark ruling

From Washington Blade staff and wire reports | Apr 3, 8:50 AM

In an historic ruling, justices in the Iowa Supreme Court on Friday unanimously granted marriage rights to gay couples living in the state.

The decision is the fourth time that a state Supreme Court has determination that a state constitution should marriage rights to gay couples living in the state. Same-sex marriage was previously available in Massachusetts and Connecticut, and briefly in California.

In the opinion, justices determined the statutory ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional because Polk County “has been unable to identify a constitutionally adequate justification for excluding plaintiffs from the institution of civil marriage.

http://campaign.constantcontact.com/render?v=001sOQQvBzrNge-GV6aQP6ZFi8FlOtBRyoUcazD34IIjmMQ2txGCiFauacRcaKxPxRjz-ZYkLotWIOK20uSVqOOctilave5Ps8jSZHNvEmPuk2e6cqi1P3eeg%3D%3D